• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!


  • Subject: Re: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • From: "Joe Little" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:22:19 -0700

On 8/12/06, Jerry W. Walker <email@hidden> wrote:
Hi, Pierce,

Your first line reminds me of a comment made by one of my young
(early 20-something) colleagues when I first got into WO in the late
90's. After a couple months working with it he asked, "So, how do you
like working with WebObjects?".

I mentioned that I preferred the control that we were achieving with
Client/Server systems and that this seemed like a throw back to the
days of IBM 3270s. He responded, "Client/server...   Oh, that's so
1980's!"

Imagine my confusion as I stood there thinking of the 1980s as a
still relatively recent period in computing with few negative
connotations.

In any case, I respectfully (and without a great deal of deep
thought) disagree with your position. I have always appreciated how
relatively clean WO left the html template file with the only tag
added being a simple <webobjects name=x> tag that our graphics
designers had no trouble recognizing or working around.

I still prefer that over the clutter that some of the other web
serving technologies leave in their html templates.

As someone who doesn't enjoy nor truly understand/grok CSS, XML, XHTML, I do prefer the simplicity that allowed easy understanding of the current WO model. I agree with Jerry that keeping that model, at least during a transition, would be preferred.


In any case, it's a worthwhile subject for discussion and I'm looking forward to other's comments.

Regards,
Jerry

On Aug 12, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:

>
>
>  Starting hopefully a new, productive thread of discussion.
>
>  Personally, I find the whole way WO does dynamic tags to be very
> 1995...
>
>  These days, I think WO should have tags more along the lines of
> what's become more of a standard: legal XHTML tags like the following:
>
>  <span  woid:replace="food">Sample Data</span>
>
> (accompanying WOD)
>
>   food: WOString
>   {
>     value=session.food; /// hmmm... I must be hungry.
>   }
>
>  The big problem for the WYSIWYG editors has always been that they
> have to read two places to figure out what a tag resolves to in
> HTML terms. Why not have:
>
> <form woid:attributes="hamburger">
>   ...stuff
> </form>
>
> hamburger : WOForm
> {
>
> }
>
> Perhaps rather then whine about WOB dying, we should turn
> dreamweaver/Golive/That firefox thing into WOB...
>
>  What do you all think? Really, it's just a matter of replacing the
> template parser, and thanks to jadclipse, that stuff all has the
> source available...
>
>
>  Pierce
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> 40gmail.com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


-- __ Jerry W. Walker, WebObjects Developer/Instructor for High Performance Industrial Strength Internet Enabled Systems

     email@hidden
     203 278-4085        office



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags! (From: "Pierce T. Wetter III" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags! (From: "Jerry W. Walker" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Time out!
  • Next by Date: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • Previous by thread: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • Next by thread: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread