Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: WO PR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO PR

Subject: Re: WO PR
From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:38:44 +0200

Hello,

I think "tone" is something that it is permissible to upgrade :-).


Maybe the negative sounding statement(s) can be moved out of the
introduction block to the proposed new "Disadvantages" section ?

The WO Wikibook introduction sounds more neutral to me in comparison:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects

A fair (ie not just WO propoganda) comaprision with Rails could
usefully be attached to the "OSS Alternatives" section.


I found one comparison in the WebObjects WikiBook. I just added some
links to the WOCOM Wiki with pros and cons to be - hopefully - fair
there also:

WO to Ruby on Rails (2005, Deirdre Saoirse Moen, Rails side)
http://deirdre.net/posts/2005/08/webobjects-to-ruby-on-rails/ and
http://deirdre.net/wp-content/extra_content/wo-to-rails.pdf

WO vs Ruby on Rails (2006, Jonathan Rentzsch, WO side)
Does anyone have these slides ?
Related: http://desperatepundit.com/blog/cremes/technology/2006/02/15/WebObjects-versus-Ruby-On-Rails.html?page=comments

WebObjects "Myths" vs Ruby on Rails
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Alternative_Technologies/Ruby_on_Rails

( Location: http://www.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOCOM/WOCOM+Marketing
)


Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: WO PR
From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>


Prev by Date:
Re: DB Columns showing up twice in SQL statement.

Next by Date:
Re: Reusable translated button

Previous by thread:
Re: WO PR

Next by thread:
Re: WO PR

Index(es):

Date
Thread