• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06


  • Subject: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:29:30 -0400

Hello!

I think you are forgetting .NET which has wonderful tools and it is tightly integrated with SQL Server and Windows 2000.

WO+Tiger can compete against .NET+Windows 2000, it is cheaper, faster, easier and more elegant.

But the tools in .NET are completely integrated, very fast and relatively mature.

WO cannot compete directly against every open source technology invented, but it can compete against .NET.

.NET requires a Windows 2000 server to deploy, WO a Tiger Server. I can see business there.

David


On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:54 PM, email@hidden wrote:


I am in FULL agreement with David Avendasora's post, which I pruned
from here.

On 28 Aug 2006, at 14:59, Miguel Arroz wrote:

  But think on all the other solutions out there. J2EE has tools?
As far as I know, no. Everyone uses third-party Java IDEs. Ruby on
Rails has tools? Everyone uses TextMate or so. If apple pointed
WOLips as the "official" tools for WO, it would still be better
than with all those other tools - and those tools have success.

Interesting point. However, J2EE is a godawful mess, and was so from the start; it is an examplar of what to avoid. Rails is designed around the principle of "no configuration", or "programming by convention", and so TextMate is the ideal IDE for it. WO config files, eomodels and wods, are complex, and a decent GUI app is essential. These would therefore have to be part of the officially supported corpus (except that Apple are deprecating everything, and have said that they won't officially support anything else).

  Send Apple feedback with your concerns, so they may know what the
community feels.

Nah, Apple can read their own lists, just like everyone else.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
      • From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: WO Mailing list manager?
  • Next by Date: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Previous by thread: Re: Direct to Java Client and WOLips
  • Next by thread: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread