Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
- Subject: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
- From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:05:40 +0100
On 28 Aug 2006, at 18:29, David Sanchez wrote:
I think you are forgetting .NET which has wonderful tools and it is
tightly integrated with SQL Server and Windows 2000.
The latter is a good reason not to use it. And yet, I am being
biased and bigoted, as is my right; I get to choose what I deploy with.
But the tools in .NET are completely integrated, very fast and
relatively mature.
What this tells us is that tools alone are not enough to make a good
product, you need a degree of adequateness, of being "good enough",
in all major areas.
.NET requires a Windows 2000 server to deploy, WO a Tiger Server. I
can see business there.
WO doesn't require Tiger Server, or even Tiger, to deploy. You can
deploy anywhere, it is just Tiger that is the supported environment.
Other platforms are perfectly good choices for deployment - even
Windows :-).
Paul
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden