• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: refreshing and relationships
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: refreshing and relationships


  • Subject: Re: refreshing and relationships
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:30:58 +0100


processRecentChanges() gets called by saveChanges(). t does however not propagate changes to the parent store like saveChanges() does.

It's role is to apply delete rules.

I find it to be a good idea to call processRecentChanges() regularly. E.g. at the end of some kind of run loop.

Pierre




Dev WO <email@hidden>

01/16/2006 12:50 PM

To
email@hidden
cc
Tom Woteki <email@hidden>, email@hidden, webobjects-dev-bounces+pierre.bernard=email@hidden
Subject
Re: refreshing and relationships





Hi Pierre,
I've red the API about processRecentChanges(), but I still have a question as it may help me on a problem I have:
does processRecentChanges() will save to the datastore? or is it just a way to get the correct array (if it has been edited) in Tom's example?

Thanks

Xavier




Hi!


Rather than deleting the object manually I would suggest you configure the delete rule of your relationship to your liking. With an "owns destination" relationship a call to removeObjectFromRelationshipWithKey will remove the object from the array and subsequently delete it.


A call to EOeditingContext.processRecentChanges() will trigger the actual processing of such delete rules.


Pierre




Tom Woteki <email@hidden>
Sent by: webobjects-dev-bounces+pierre.bernard=
email@hidden

01/15/2006 06:33 PM


To
email@hidden
cc
Subject
refreshing and relationships







I'm stumped. I guess I'm just overlooking something very obvious. I'm  
hoping that some wiser head hereabouts can help me. Thanks in advance.

My problem is not the usual one implied by the subject line. I am  
_not_ trying to refresh data in a to-many relationship that may have  
been changed in another object store. For purposes of my problem you  
can assume there is only one object store, one editing context (the  
session's default) and one user involved.

I have a source object, sourceObj, with a to-many relationship. Say  
the relationship key is "targets" . I obtain the related objects by  
invoking sourceObj.targets() where the method targets() returns an  
NSArray as a cover for a call to storedValueForKey( "targets" ).

I now invoke:

/* Assume editingContext exists and all EOs are in it */
editingContext.deleteObject( aSpecificTargetObject )

Upon subsequent invocations of targets() (and prior to saveChanges())  
the returned array contains the target object I just deleted. This is  
my problem:  I think that object should no longer be in the array.

It seems the only way I can see the effects of the deletion is by  
executing this sequence:

editingContext.deleteObject( aSpecificTargetObject );
editingContext.saveChanges();
editingContext.refreshObject( sourceObject ); /* If I don't do this I  
still see the deleted object */

However, I don't want immediately to save the changes, so this  
approach is unsatisfactory to me. (And I prefer not to use display  
groups.)

Any ideas?

Thanks
Tom



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:


This email sent to
email@hidden




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender
of this message. (
email@hidden)
This email message has been checked for the presence of computer
viruses; however this protection does not ensure this message is
virus free.
Banque centrale du Luxembourg; Tel ++352-4774-1;
http://www.bcl.lu
**********************************************************************

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender
of this message. (email@hidden)
This email message has been checked for the presence of computer
viruses; however this protection does not ensure this message is
virus free.
Banque centrale du Luxembourg; Tel ++352-4774-1; http://www.bcl.lu
**********************************************************************
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: refreshing and relationships (From: Dev WO <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: refreshing and relationships
  • Next by Date: Flashback (aka Undo) with Oracle 10g / 9i with old EOAdaptor
  • Previous by thread: Re: refreshing and relationships
  • Next by thread: Re: refreshing and relationships
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread