• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: State of WebObjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: State of WebObjects


  • Subject: Re: State of WebObjects
  • From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:31:23 -0400

On 28-Jun-06, at 3:44 PM, Scott Henderson wrote:

Hi,

I am researching WO for use in an upcoming project.

Welcome.

Since I am new to this list, I do not have a feel for what is going on with WO or the WO Community.

I would love to hear Good/Bad comments concerning the WO Development Environment. Any comparison to Ruby on Rails would be helpful, as well.

You are likely hear fairly biased views about WO around here given the name of the list. :-)


WebObjects Pros:

1. Mature, stable, feature rich environment. In many areas unsurpassed by *any* other web development tool or framework.
2. Strong OO architecture. Usually makes doing the "right thing" (eg. MVC) the "easiest thing"
3. Pure Java - despite your feelings about the language itself, being able to tap into the myriad of Java class libraries out there is invaluable.
4. Direct to X technologies - definitely best of breed.
5. Free to develop, free? to deploy (on OSX at least)
6. Large selection of database options.
7. As Cocoa is to desktop application development, WO is web apps. A seasoned WebObjects developer can do an amazing amount very quickly with very little code.
8. ProjectWONDER


WebObjects Cons:

1. Mature and stable could be viewed as stagnant. Feature richness comes with a corresponding steepness of learning curve (TANSTAAFL).
2. Shrinking list of development options
3. Not open source
4. Some are concerned about Apples commitment to the platform. (I have to say I am not one of them.)


Is it worth investing one's valuable time

That is your decision to make but I think so.

Or has it been superseded by new, improved technologies?

Are there competitors? Yes definitely. Has it been "superseded" by any of them? In my view, no.


Rails is an interesting contender, and I'm glad to see a new well designed framework on the field. But it is still very young and has a long way to go before it equals the richness of WO.

--
;david

--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-defer-ous' adj. producing or containing code
site:   http://www.codeferous.com
blog: http://david.codeferous.com




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: State of WebObjects
      • From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
References: 
 >State of WebObjects (From: Scott Henderson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: State of WebObjects
  • Next by Date: Re: State of WebObjects
  • Previous by thread: State of WebObjects
  • Next by thread: Re: State of WebObjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread