Re: Community Wish List
Re: Community Wish List
- Subject: Re: Community Wish List
- From: Karl Gretton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:24:43 -0300
The only danger of using Eclipstick is that someone might come up
with something to suggest that we are trying to put lipstick on the
PIG...which WO clearly is NOT!
I personally liked this cover: http://static.flickr.com/
70/197986751_d4bd745e2c_m.jpg
We should surely come up with a .NET v3.0 version of this (or Ruby on
Rails ;-P)
Karl
On 5-Sep-06, at 3:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:00 PM, M. Blanc wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006, at 17:28, Marc Oesch wrote:
And I wanted to ask if anybody is actually thinking about a
replacement for WOBuilder or already working on it ?
I'm all for having babies –I personally had three, though my wife
helped a lot– so I can tell you from experience that the very
first thing we are going to need is for the father to release a
little something. Now, if the father is Apple, that something
must be «the standards and formats that WO depends upon» that
Daryl mentioned. For good or for bad, such release can happen at
anytime from now throughout the useful life of the Leopard... so I
wouldn't get too excited just yet.
Until then I would suggest we start compiling a Community Wishlist
of features we'd like the baby to have. Yep, real babies are not
affected by wishlists, but software projects certainly are. The
idea here is that a very powerful graphical modeler we can even
affect So, if I could only have three wishes, they may well could
be these:
#1• For the whole project to get a code name soon.
Knowing that nothing is final at this stage, almost any name is
fine with me as long as we settle for something before everyone
starts calling it "The Baby". My vote is for WonderLips.
I don't know that I agree with the "Whole Project" concept. Wonder
and WOLips are separate and not connected now. I think it would be
better to maintain that. It probably also looks more active, if
there is more than one project for WebObjects.
I do like Eclipstick as a name.
Chuck
#2• For the BVM –that's the Baby's View Modeler that would
substitute WOBuilder– I'd like I could start working from a high
resolution graphic or SVG design made by a professional designer.
I would then go along marking areas on the picture and saying
'this is going to be a WOForm; these, WOButtons', so that the
corresponding web server resources would be automatically created
(and properly linked) at different resolutions for different CSS
"media" tags, browsing device capabilities, user preferences, etc.
[ I see no reason for constraining the design to be 2D-flat or
even static, but I suspect that's too big a jump right now for
Eclipse. For one, Eclipse is just an evolution of the Smalltalk
browser, and when some well known Smalltalk guys felt ready to go
to higher dimensions they didn't rendered the 3D world inside the
browser, but the browser inside the 3D world. ]
#3• In the BVM too I'd like to be able to select a flow, or more
than one, of page portions[†] that would be presented in some
meaningful sequence to the client browser[‡].
[†] something like the flowing you can do in Acrobat,
[‡] something like a wap stack.
I know I'm showing my bias thinking again on small real state
devices, but if it is awkward to develop for three different
desktop browsers, developing for a myriad of small devices is
plain crazy. All this should be automated from the beginning to
the extreme... and the extreme could be some clever D2W
presentational rules that would even take into account if the
presentation flow is going to be managed from the server or from
the client (some small devices are really stupid). On second
thought, something similar could prove useful too for designing
whatever substitutes ajax in the future.
#4• Yeah, there is a #4, I like round numbers. My last wish is
just that this thread ends up with 2^64 wishes. Thanks for helping.
PS:
>Then you could start thinking about the name.
The proposed names - Wonderlips, Wonderland, Wonderlust... - were
supposed to be for the whole suite of tools and generate attention
That was my understanding too.
with a sticky name, but I agree the babies have to be born first :)
A sticky name for the WonderLips Graphical Editor could be
Eclipstick....this suggestion is derived from a post from Simon
Mclean a few days ago, but it could sound funnier than I expect
since English is but my second language.
Cheers
--mbj
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40global-village.net
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40protocolis.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden