Re: Anyone used sequoia?
Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- Subject: Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:31:05 -0700
Hi Lachlan,
Given that they advertise
* No modification of existing applications or databases.
* Operational with any database providing a JDBC driver.
I would not expect any problems. EOF is pretty isolated from the
JDBC level, it just talks to the API which this sounds like it handles.
I was chatting with Mike Schrag a while ago about doing this with
FrontBase clustering.
Chuck
On Apr 16, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience with sequioa[1] and WebObjects. Any
highlights, problems...?
In short, what I'm looking for is redundancy. i.e., if the database
goes south then the webobjects app is also out of luck seeing as
its connection dictionary is tied to a specific ip address.
Any ProjectWonder solutions already around for this scenario?
Thanks.
[1] http://sequoia.continuent.org/
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40global-village.net
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden