Re: Anyone used sequoia?
Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- Subject: Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:53:27 +1000
Hi Mike,
On 17/04/2007, at 11:28 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I have used FrontBase's clustering, and pgcluster w/ postgresql,
which was a complete disaster (I was able to get it out of sync
fairly readily).
Hmm, okay, why was that?
FrontBase clustering "just works". It's really simple to setup and
has worked very well for us.
Sounds nice. Can you tell me a little more about it. The problem
we're trying to solve in essence is the problem where one database is
the master and the other the slave (which is seemingly read-only). If
the master goes down then nothing can be written.
Perhaps no database solves that issue - but can you tell me more
about the specifics for the clustering in terms of redundancy?
Thanks.
(Ps, We're currently deployed with mysql, so any change to something
like FrantBase ... I'd need to be able to convince some people
here... so feel free to mention any other benefits/comparisons in
this thread also ;-)
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden