Re: Anyone used sequoia?
Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- Subject: Re: Anyone used sequoia?
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:20:15 -0400
All the postgresql clustering solutions are 3rd party and it's very
hard to gauge what the "production readiness" of any particular
version is. In particular,
btw -- pgcluster = spend an entire day dorking around trying to
figure out why things aren't working. FrontBase =
set default database MyDB@Host1;
create cluster;
add member MyDB@Host2; // ... creates and replicates over to Host2
add member MyDB@Host3; // ... creates and replicates over to Host3
start cluster;
and change your connection string to:
jdbc:FrontBase://MyDB@Host1/MyDB@Host2/MyDB@Host3
replication in FrontBase is even easier, btw.
However, FrontBase is not the fastest database. PGSQL handed FB a
beating for several operations (I think maybe this is PG's MVCC
locking system showing wins? I'm not really sure though ...). I
have read in previous posts (Chuck sent me a link to it a couple
weeks ago), however, that shows that FB comes back with a vengeance
for REALLY REALLY big databases where all the others fell over.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden