Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
- Subject: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:23:15 +0100
Hi!
On 2007/08/14, at 17:40, Chuck Hill wrote:
See, it is trying to create an UPDATE statement for this object.
Something has trashed the EC state.
Maybe try adding
ec.undoManager().removeAllActions(); before the call to saveChanges
(), or try getting rid of the undo manager before making any changes:
ec.setUndoManager(null);
If you are not reverting, you don't need this.
Hmmm, I have some recollection than an exception thrown during the
delete processing of saveChanges() trashing EC state. IIRC, it was
undo manager related. I have an EC subclass that calls
ec.undoManager().removeAllActions(); after each successful save to
avoid this problem. So this might be close to what is happening to
you.
Tried both (the setUndoManager(null) and removeAllActions()) and
it still doesn't work. I give up. Going to rewrite this using the
technique I described earlier.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |