Re: WOBuilder Replacement
Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- Subject: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:58:05 -0700
On Jul 4, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Stateless is a little more work to implement than stateful I guess,
A little.
however it does have some advantages AFAIK (please correct me if I
am wrong) such as
- Ready to use in stateless pages since stateless pages/components
can only contain stateless components,
- Lower memory usage, one component instance typically, and maybe
just a couple in certain scenarios, it being shared across pages
Correct.
Is there any other advantages for stateless? Does it help app speed?
Yes, if no other way then by reducing garbage collection and
instantiation time.
I have almost always created stateless nonsynchronizing components
after I first watched the WWDC sessions on reusable components. Is
striving for stateless overrated nowadays given the speed and
memory of our servers?
If a component can be made stateless, it should. But you can do some
things more easily (or just can, period) with stateful components.
Chuck
Kieran
On Jul 4, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Stateful NonSynchronized Reusable Components are pretty useful as
well.
On Jul 4, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Topic = "Stateless NonSynchronized Reusable Components" ........
these make life easier and easier
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
3. Large, convoluted, table based layouts are very difficult
to visualize in a text only view. This is pretty obvious, but
since I've been using css instead of tables and breaking
things into components for my own stuff forever, I've not
confronted it head-on before. So I think using the component
editor actually encourages you to write better components.
We can hope. I have been disturbed to see how little use many
WO developers make of the power of components. It should be
their bread and butter, not some advanced technique.
Topic for WOWODC 2008 ? :-)
In fact that is one of the topics I am considering.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden