• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WOBuilder Replacement
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WOBuilder Replacement


  • Subject: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:36:11 -0400


Le 07-07-05 à 06:34, Jerry W. Walker a écrit :

Although $500 might be a fair reward for such a tool, I truly doubt that enough parties would pay it to cover Chuck's and Mike's estimates.

I think that there are few on this list who individually, or whose companies, would pony up $500 per developer head for an undeveloped piece of software. That would mean that either some one or two companies underwrites the development, or the developers work for about a year on no pay until they have a product to market, then they might get paid, but only after people have taken the time to download and test the resulting product and found it worthy. That latter activity can take a few months for many in the community.

Once they have the new WOBuilder in hand, how many of them will hold the old WOBuilder in the other hand and say, "Hmmm... $500 for this one and the old one is FREE along with the WO frameworks, all the other development tools and Project Wonder! Does it make sense for me to spend $500 on this one tool. Nah, we can get by with the old tools till they cease to function, then we can keep a couple workstations running the old versions of Mac OS X and WO to get by for a few more years.

To Chuck and Mike, was your "... estimate of US$100,000 to US $150,000 ..." based on starting from scratch, or on building from the original WOBuilder's Objective C codebase? If Apple provided the code base, would that reduce the estimate in your opinion?

I think building a new WOBuilder is a worthy objective, but I don't realistically believe that whoever does it will recoup the money indicated by estimates of the sizes given.

For financing, we can do the same thing as the OpenOffice.org did to finance their trip to WWDC : putting a donation site online, and if they don't meet their target, they give the money back. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: "Jerry W. Walker" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Next by Date: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Previous by thread: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Next by thread: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread