Re: WOBuilder Replacement
Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- Subject: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:29:23 -0400
Attachment:
Picture 2.png
Description: application/applefile
?
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Louis Demers wrote:
On 6-Jul-07, at 16:33 , Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello Janine;
The only feature of WOBuilder that I consider important is the one
that helps you to visualize what your component will look like when
it's rendered. WOBuilder always did a lousy job of this, especially
It's interesting; we all have quite different ways of working with
components which probably illustrates different ways of thinking.
I really do like Mike's component editor, but to augment it, I
would also enjoy the visual modeller in WOB. I really do not feel
at all like I need a full render of the page with data or anything
-- what WOB does is perfect for my use. It's really a logical
view for making bindings. I'd love to have the time for such an
undertaking. :-/
You expressed exactly what I was trying to say. Indeed, I believe
that the graphical presentation must not aim at the aesthetics of
the page/component but rather it's structure along with a decent
inspector for the available bindings. The aesthetics of the
presentation should be done through CSS and could be handed off to
other tools like CSSEdit and the like.
In a sense, couldn't it be structured like the eomodeler in
eclipse ? A tree showing the structure and some inspector specific
to the webobject tags being edited ?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mdimension.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden