Re: historical context ...
Re: historical context ...
- Subject: Re: historical context ...
- From: Mark Morris <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:19:52 -0500
As I recall (and I didn't start with WebObjects until 1997, so it
could have been different in 1995 ;-), it was $50K for an unlimited
deployment license. I believe the per developer costs were much,
much less, but I can't remember specifics.
-- Mark
On Jun 14, 2007, at 3:49 AM, Cheong Hee (Datasonic) wrote:
It was once even voted by developers as the top 3 Java Developer
Tools in one of the surveys, if I could recall correctly ...
The price at that time was nearly USD40k per developer license!
Wait a minute...
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Gavin Eadie wrote:
The approach, which supports development for Sun's Java, will
allow programmers to vastly expand offerings on the Web, changing
it from a fairly static medium to a more interactive one.
Did it start out supporting Java, then switch to Objective-C, and
then back to Java??? If so, I had missed that part.
No, I assume that was a misunderstanding by the original journalist,
like the comment about writing web browser plug-ins.
WebObjects was originally written for Objective C; WebScript was
added later, and Java was added even later still.
Paul
PS Shame I can't be at WWDC; in other news, the root canal treatment
is going well.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40onpointsoftware.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden