• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: historical context ...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: historical context ...


  • Subject: Re: historical context ...
  • From: Alexander Spohr <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:40:45 +0200

I remember these prices:

 Developer: $3000
Deployment: $100.000 (Per System, unlimited CPUs)
Dep-Backup: $50.000

So there never was an unlimited deployment.

And that where the best times for WO; you could sell it to the Big Players.
After the price-drop no one took WO seriously anymore. It almost killed the high-end market.


	atze

ps. We started using WO with version 0.9...


Am 14.06.2007 um 16:19 schrieb Mark Morris:

As I recall (and I didn't start with WebObjects until 1997, so it could have been different in 1995 ;-), it was $50K for an unlimited deployment license. I believe the per developer costs were much, much less, but I can't remember specifics.
-- Mark


On Jun 14, 2007, at 3:49 AM, Cheong Hee (Datasonic) wrote:

It was once even voted by developers as the top 3 Java Developer Tools in one of the surveys, if I could recall correctly ...

The price at that time was nearly USD40k per developer license!


Wait a minute...

On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Gavin Eadie wrote:

The approach, which supports development for Sun's Java, will
allow programmers to vastly expand offerings on the Web, changing
it from a fairly static medium to a more interactive one.

Did it start out supporting Java, then switch to Objective-C, and then back to Java??? If so, I had missed that part.

No, I assume that was a misunderstanding by the original journalist, like the comment about writing web browser plug-ins.

WebObjects was originally written for Objective C; WebScript was
added later, and Java was added even later still.

Paul

PS Shame I can't be at WWDC; in other news, the root canal treatment
is going well.



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40onpointsoftware.com


This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40freeport.de


This email sent to email@hidden

Freeport & Soliversum Alexander Spohr email@hidden www.freeport.de


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: historical context ...
      • From: Mark Morris <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: historical context ... (From: "Cheong Hee (Datasonic)" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: historical context ... (From: Mark Morris <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Getting Started With WO site
  • Next by Date: Re: Getting Started With WO site
  • Previous by thread: Re: historical context ...
  • Next by thread: Re: historical context ...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread