• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Java Client : who is using it ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java Client : who is using it ?


  • Subject: Re: Java Client : who is using it ?
  • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:11:47 +1000

Hi there,

On 24/06/2007, at 6:14 AM, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:

<. snip .>
Are we satsified with this approach, assuming nothing gets dropped? YES. YES. YES. YES. Swing is getting better and better, Java in general as well. JFX says it will refresh things up, AND be compatible Swing. Java 2D and 3D are getting better as well. The platform is growing in capability. Not even mentioning the plethora of fantastic third party code that can be found (printing, graphing, GUI improvements...). And WO provides enormous data sharing capability for it. Which is AFAIK furthest down the road in it's line of business, AND provides a way to output the same data easily in browsers. And yes, there is other good stuff out there, but am I wrong in seeing this also as an excellent choice?


Sorry if I am over-advocating. It feels warranted by the current state of things.

Best regards,
Florijan

p.s. - except for Philippe here, I know of only three or four other people who use WO this way. I continuously wonder why there aren't more of us...

Can I ask what you're licensing arrangement is? Last time I checked, and unless I'm reading it incorrectly... JavaClient doesn't benefit from the same freedom as non-JavaClient. i.e., the section below seems to indicate that JavaClient can only be used on Apple-labelled- and-licenced-systems. This needs to be opened up for a start.


We've got a large 3-tier Swing server/client app using Cayenne. When initially deciding on what technologies to use the aforementioned licence restrictions for 3-tier EOF apps was the deciding factor on ruling that out. We'd apparently even offered money to Apple so as to embed eof, but no deal was available. That's all history now...

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck


D. WebObjects Software. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, you may use, install and permit others to access the WebObjects deployment software included with the Developer Software to deploy application programs developed using Apple’s WebObjects Software. You may also reproduce and distribute: (1) over a network, components of the WebObjects deployment software for installation and use by others (“Java Client End Users”) on any remote computer’s volatile memory (e.g. RAM) to enable Java Client functionality for the sole purpose of communicating with Apple’s WebObjects Software that may be installed and executed on the same Apple-labeled computer on which you have installed the Developer Software (the "Licensed System"); and (2) both manually and automatically over a network, components of the WebObjects deployment software for installation and use by Java Client End Users on any remote computer’s non-volatile memory (e.g. ROM) to enable Java Client functionality for the sole purpose of communicating with Apple’s WebObjects Software that may be installed and executed on the Licensed System; provided that all distributions to Java Client End Users are made under terms that are at least as restrictive as those set forth in this License and contain the disclaimers and limitations set forth in Sections 6 and 7 of this License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, you may also deploy server applications built with the WebObjects Software on any platform.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Java Client : who is using it ?
      • From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Java Client : who is using it ? (From: Philippe Rabier <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java Client : who is using it ? (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OT] moving to Eclipse... still some issue
  • Next by Date: Re: [OT] moving to Eclipse... still some issue
  • Previous by thread: Re: Java Client : who is using it ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Java Client : who is using it ?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread