Re: Pretty printing?
Re: Pretty printing?
- Subject: Re: Pretty printing?
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:00:35 -0400
er.extensions.ERXApplication.responseCompressionEnabled=true
.. if you use Project Wonder.
I've also wondered about this. Pretty Printing is tough, though,
because it's often possible to cause some rendering artifacts if it's
not done carefully.
ms
On Jun 29, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 29.06.2007, at 06:05, Lachlan Deck wrote:
has anyone used any pretty printing for WO responses? Any
suggestions?
There can be a *lot* of white space in the output when you've got
lots of little reusable components in play.
To get smaller transfer sizes and better transfer times, we use
mod_gzip which seems to work very good. I'v never done any "pretty
printing" for responses despite that I write my components so, that
is is not too much white space in there.
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mdimension.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden