• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO(Re)petition
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO(Re)petition


  • Subject: Re: WO(Re)petition
  • From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:51:13 +1000

I agree – calling for open source is not thinking different, it's thinking the same. This industry is too full of popular solutions that don't really address the real problem. I think that's what Steve means when he says think different, address the problem and the need. I don't think open source will solve WO's problems, that doesn't mean that I don't think it would be nice to be able to browse through the code, but evaluate what the problems are and then solve those problems. I think Pierre's group at Apple are doing that.

Ian

On 03/10/2007, at 7:13 AM, David LeBer wrote:


On 2-Oct-07, at 5:04 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

Think different: please present any valid arguments to sustain your request.

Think different: please request what you want through the proper channels. People are trying to create a WO Community, being the communication between WO users and Apple a goal. If you want to help and to make your voice be heard, you should help building the WO Community, instead of flooding the mail-list.

Think different: please THINK if open sourcing WO is what you really want. Because what I want is Apple to actively develop it, doing a good job that results in innovative features and QUALITY work, and yes, documented. How many Web frameworks do you know that are innovative, with a solid, very solid code base (with a few bugs, naturally), and well documented... AND OPEN SOURCE? Because I don't know any one.

Think different: open source WO clones/copies/alternatives (use whatever pleases you) exist. Do you use them? No. Why? Because WO is still the best. Did being open source helped? I don't think so.

Think different: if you REALLY need to look at the WO source, you know you can.

Think different: again, stop flooding my mailbox. If you really want to make your point, put together some decent arguments, talk with the people who are working to build the WO Community, and use them to get in touch with Apple.

I don't mean to be rude, but this is getting a little childish...

I was just about to click send on a message that said the same thing...


OK, not the same thing, Miguel said it better :-)

;david

--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site:   http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40sportstec.com


This email sent to email@hidden



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO(Re)petition
      • From: Stephane Guyot <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re:WO(Re)petition (From: Jeremy Rosenberg <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO(Re)petition (From: Sandeep Chayapathi <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO(Re)petition (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO(Re)petition (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WORequest Headers
  • Next by Date: Re: WO(Re)petition
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO(Re)petition
  • Next by thread: Re: WO(Re)petition
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread