Re: Leaving WebObjects
Re: Leaving WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Leaving WebObjects
- From: "Robert B. Hanviriyapunt" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:51:23 -0500
Sorry, to clarify, I would re-do the whole thing WITH EOF even if it
means a bit of rewrite of their existing code. I'll tell you, they
stuff quite a bit of it into MS SQL procedures. Can you say EWWWWW!?
= Robert =
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Honestly, if you don't use EOF and you use Flex/OpenLazlo/
Silverlight/whatever, WO is pretty useless in those cases. The two
biggest advantages of WO is EOF and the presentation layer, if you
only use Web services without connecting to a database (what is
your data sources ??) and start using a RIA layer, you don't use
much WO power (unless you are generating your LZX XML stuff
dynamically from your WO app).
Sorry, I did not see the offer of a support contract. Who was it
from? Was it the post by Mike Schrag? Call at let me know the
cost for such a thing! 312-246-5509
I still think that the mind of the director is set on RIA
(OpenLaszlo) -- which I have personally integrated with WebObjects
over SOAP just fine -- but with Struts. I just don't know how to
convince her.
I do like OpenLaszlo (the resulting UI just feels fun and coding
in the LZX XML is not bad). But if it went away and there were no
more WebO ... I mean this job has been the best ever, but ...
well, at least I'd still be doing Java-something.
If I were tech director, I'd take a step back and re-do the whole
thing in OpenLaszlo/WebO/Java!
= Robert =
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden