Re: Leaving WebObjects
Re: Leaving WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Leaving WebObjects
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 06:40:06 +1000
Hi there,
On 09/04/2008, at 4:50 AM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote:
For some time now, my company has been set on leaving WebObjects. We
have been running WebObjects 5.2 on Windows servers.
For some time WO5.3.3 has been out... and free. And WO5.4.1 is also out.
We haven't moved 100% yet, but my next project will be using
JavaServer Faces. And another fairly new project will be using
OpenLaszlo with our existing J2E back-end.
Company's reasons for leaving:
1. WebObjects is proprietary
So is Windows. Why aren't they running BSD or Linux? ;-)
2. New versions of WebObjects is not supported on Windows
What do they understand by support? The frameworks can be used on
*any* platform.
3. Perceived lack of knowledgeable WebObjects programmers (I'm in
the Chicago suburbs -- Northbrook, IL, to be precise)
Perhaps they've not been paying attention to the mailings lists.
(specifically: webobjects-dev, wonder-disc, woproject-dev).
We do NOT use:
1. Xcode/WebObjects tools [Xcode or WOBuilder or EOModeler] (except
for me on a MacBook Pro -- only because I requested it)
Hardly anyone uses Xcode, WOBuilder, EOModeler anymore -- especially
if you're on Leopard. They use Eclipse/WOLips which is much better and
improving in leaps and bounds all the time.
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home
- perhaps you/they've not had a look through the wiki... tutorials etc
2. EOF
If you're not using EOF - what part of WebObjects were you using?
3. WONDER
That's a huge loss - especially given that they're big on non-
proprietary frameworks.
4. Servlet container (which I do not prefer anyway)
I personally enjoy WebObjects development and wish that WebObjects
would be more palatable to companies such as mine.
I do understand where companies (or more specifically, management) are
coming from when they get nervous about a certain technology such as
WebObjects. For years Apple was quite silent about WebObjects. e.g.,
Bug reports went unnoticed, updates didn't seem to be a priority. But
that has turned around quite dramatically in the last couple of
years... ironically beginning with the announcement of the tools
deprecation.
The community is thriving and Apple (i.e., the employees) are also
contributing in significant ways and being proactive about bug reports
and taking part in the mailing lists.
Please excuse the ranting, but I want someone at Apple to know that
as great as WebObjects technology is [I personally think it is the
BEST I've seen anywhere], it is losing ground because if it's lack
in thet top 3 items mentioned. I wish so bad that Apple would do
something about it.
Personally I think Apple has done something about it - and for the
better. But as I've explained, you're only left with one argument:
proprietary. You can't argue with management, unfortunately, when
their on the buzz word bandwagon of open-source despite the maturity
of a particular framework in comparison to other stuff...
Certainly if it's completely closed and there's no possibility of
customising stuff... but we've already mentioned WOnder (or Houdah, or
similar frameworks)
I'm guessing people's response will be: Don't hold your breath.
Perhaps you held it too long and didn't realise what's happened these
last few years ;-)
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden