RE: Leaving WebObjects
RE: Leaving WebObjects
- Subject: RE: Leaving WebObjects
- From: "Robert B. Hanviriyapunt" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:05:13 -0500
Good point.
I think I'll speak for my manager and say the key is "Open Source". And also, another key, at least for the part of interchangeability, is POJO or container or something managed by configuration files like Struts I guess. I dunno. I can't tell you exactly what the director would say. But hey I introduced the use of FOP to transform objects in XML format to PDFs! That idea worked for her.
Someone also mentioned about the term "Support". I am referring to Apple's clear claim/distinction that WebObjects 5.3+ is NOT "supported" on Windows. It would go a long way for Apple if they just extended support to Windows, as bad as it sounds.
= Robert =
From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:37:13 -0400
Am I missing something? How can anyone say that OpenLaszlo is any less proprietary than WO. WO is a framework of some Java classes. At my office we use ADF/BC an Oracle framework of some Java classes. OpenLaszlo is a framework of, well I don't know what, but it certainly isn't any less proprietary. Code written in OpenLaszlo would still need to run with dependency on that framework correct?
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden