Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
- Subject: Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
- From: David Holt <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:47:09 -0800
Hi Anjo,
I thought the interesting part is that most of the authors "pitfalls
of Java Persistence" are addressed by WebObjects, DirectToWeb, EOF
and WOnder. What's interesting is that he says he was using it in
2000 and then wandered off into the desert creating his own
persistence layer(s) when he had already had exposure to a good
solution! Maybe that's a typical story that happened as WO moved from
NeXT to Apple, but as someone who got to WebObjects much later, from
the so-called easy development environment of PHP, I wish I'd been
using WO in 2000 and not spending 3 or 4 years heading towards a
relative dead end.
David
On 5-Dec-08, at 1:18 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 05.12.2008 um 18:38 schrieb Chuck Hill:
http://fromapitosolution.blogspot.com/2008/12/criticism-of-java-
persistence.html
WebObjects gets mentioned twice. Might be an interesting read if
you have spare time.
Where exactly is the interesting part? Or is it because I have no
spare time?
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
@mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden