Re: GWT / was: [OT] New WO Years Resolutions.
Re: GWT / was: [OT] New WO Years Resolutions.
- Subject: Re: GWT / was: [OT] New WO Years Resolutions.
- From: "John Huss" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:59:26 -0600
Doesn't matter which project, because both leverage the EXT library. LGPL means that you can't use it for commerical development, unless you want to give away your source code. There has been a lot of arguing over the license, but the opinion of the EXT developers is that you need to pay them if you aren't writing an open source app.
John
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Oliver Scheel
<email@hidden> wrote:
I haven't used GWT-Ext myself. It's not a native GWT library, meaning it's not written in Java; it's just a thin Java wrapper around _javascript_ and CSS, etc. That makes it a little less attractive. Plus the Ext license is not free for commercal development I think.
There is an Ext-GWT and a gwt-ext (completely different projects). The first one requires a license and the second one is LPGL (+ modules with Apache and BSD license).
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden