Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
- Subject: Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:40:38 -0800
On Jan 13, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
What do you think?
I agree with Ken Arnold (<http://weblogs.java.net/blog/arnold/
archive/2005/06/generics_consid_1.html>) and Bruce Eckel (<http://
www.mindview.net/WebLog/log-0050>) that Java Generics are a PITA
that aren't worth the bother most of the time. The amount of time
I've spent trying to make my custom code compile under genericized
WO 5.4 without warnings is disgusting. So I'm about to decide to
@SuppressWarnings("all") every custom class and ignore Java
generics. Heresy, I know, but I'm an Objective-C, not a Java guy :-)
I am happy to see that I am not the only heretic here.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden