Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
- Subject: Re: WO5.4: Generics for objectsWithFetchSpecification ???
- From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:04:35 -0800
I hope you are joking. Warnings are important and help you find bug at
compile time instead of run time. @SuppressWarnings("all") will
suppress not only generics warning but also deprecations and others.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
email@hidden
On Jan 15, 2008, at 18:40, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
What do you think?
I agree with Ken Arnold (<http://weblogs.java.net/blog/arnold/archive/2005/06/generics_consid_1.html
>) and Bruce Eckel (<http://www.mindview.net/WebLog/log-0050>) that
Java Generics are a PITA that aren't worth the bother most of the
time. The amount of time I've spent trying to make my custom code
compile under genericized WO 5.4 without warnings is disgusting.
So I'm about to decide to @SuppressWarnings("all") every custom
class and ignore Java generics. Heresy, I know, but I'm an
Objective-C, not a Java guy :-)
I am happy to see that I am not the only heretic here.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden