Re: Maven Optimism
Re: Maven Optimism
- Subject: Re: Maven Optimism
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:51:54 -0700
On Jul 10, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
On Jul 10, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 11/07/2008, at 3:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
The rest of the patternsets are also not an Ant issue, but a
design philosophy in woproject (to not force a project layout).
Maven don't force a directory layout also.
My point was that using either Maven or woproject, if you want a
flexible layout you need to do more work. If you can accept a set
layout, your life is easier. It is not an Ant vs Maven issue as
Pierce was suggesting.
Right. It's another alternative.
I don't know if Pierce's intention was to create a this vs that
thing in general... more of a 'what works for him' thing which he
thought he'd share. Obviously, assuming this assumption is correct,
this was taken instead as an early jab given Mike's on the verge of
dropping the classpath <boom> ;-)
Yeah, that was my intention, I dislike Ant, but like WOProject, and
wish Ant worked like WOProject.
WOProject _is_ Ant. I think it is WOLips that you like. :-)
I do some stuff in the GUI, and I'm done. If Mike is making
WOProject work more that way, coolness!
I have hope.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden