Re: Maven vs Ant
Re: Maven vs Ant
- Subject: Re: Maven vs Ant
- From: "Henrique Prange" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:09:31 -0300
Hi Galen,
I think it is not like WOLips vs Xcode where the latter was deprecated
and everybody must use the former. In this case, Maven is an
alternative to Ant. In fact, you can use both if you want (like Wonder
does). Anyway, a mechanism [1][2] to develop WO projects with Maven is
not recent. They exist for more than a year.
You will see people telling that there is no reason to use Maven to
build a WebObjects project (like Chuck) and people that cannot imagine
your development lifecycle without Maven (like me). The funny part is
that both group of people are probably right. :) You have to identify
which tool fits best to your needs.
[1] http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/WOProject-Maven2
[2] http://wocreator.sourceforge.net/
Cheers,
Henrique
PS.: Everything I have been writing here is based on my observation of
the discussions and my own experience with WO and Maven. I haven't
gone neither to WOWODC nor WWDC.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Galen Rhodes
<email@hidden> wrote:
> So, is Maven becoming the new standard for building WebObjects instead of
> Ant? From a WebObjects point of view, what advantages does Maven have over
> Ant?
>
> --
> Galen Rhodes
> email@hidden
> http://www.photoyoda.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden