• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)
  • From: "M.Y. Tjoe" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:05:48 +1000

I am also interested in this issues as this may affect our choice of hardware. mac is cool but our IT department prefers windows platform. any apple guys here can confirm this?

Regards,
Harvey


On 17/06/2008, at 12:13 PM, Joe Little wrote:

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Lachlan Deck <email@hidden> wrote:
On 16/06/2008, at 11:48 PM, David LeBer wrote:

On 16-Jun-08, at 9:40 AM, Don Lindsay wrote:

So, any installer that is used for anything other than OS X, is in
violation of the WebObjects license?

Hrm, not a lawyer, standard disclaimers apply...

I think that installing is fine (especially since I think you are only
installing the run time). If you chose to use that installed runtime to
*develop* rather than deploy on non Apple hardware then you are in
violation.


Whether Apple legal actually cares enough to do anything about it is
another question.

They really want to do something about this anyway, right?! i.e., why allow
deployment anywhere but enforce development restrictions. Seems silly and
impractical... I mean you do want to debug on other platforms that you might
want to deploy to... which involves some form of development.



They adhere to the java mantra a little tightly: write once, run anywhere.


Actually, its a logical progression, and adherence to the "its a part
of Xcode" model. They want still justify its public existence in that
it sells hardware, so to speak. This is my understanding over years of
arguing this. However, its also understood that it doesn't sell much
hardware. This is perhaps why it was so closely associated with MacOSX
Server previously.


with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
@uow.edu.au


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: Don Lindsay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise) (From: "Joe Little" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence dead?
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects 5.4 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread