Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:59:45 -0600
On 20.03.2008, at 14:20, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
I would totally disagree with that. Wonder introduce another layer
of complexity and patching on top of WO.
That is just not true. When you add Wonder to an existing, complex
application that does a lot of the stuff Wonder does - maybe. But only
maybe. If you start fresh - it's way better to get the bugs that exist
fixed and the features that are missing in WO with Wonder.
Just for autolocking and the localization support it's worth using
Wonder.
You might have a different opinion, but there are bugs in WO and
Wonder fixes some of them. And there are missing features in WO and
Wonder provides them. So, from an Apple perspective, you might not
like that, but from a user's perspective, the value Wonder adds is
incredibly time saving.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden