• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO


  • Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:28 -0600

On 20.03.2008, at 16:52, Chuck Hill wrote:

You would have to be NUTS to start a new project and not use Wonder or the GVC frameworks or _something_ that does this stuff for you. Wonder is the least pain of the ones that I know.

Right. It's about not re-inventing the wheel over and over again.

If I had to remove Project WOnder I'd have to add tens of thousands of lines of Java code to my frameworks / applications to get the features I'm using ... not even worth thinking about it.

I'm not saying that it is not possible to write good and stable apps without Wonder (we are actually doing this here in the company for a very large project), but you WILL end up writing lots and lots of code that is already in Wonder just to fix problems or add missing features.

cug

--
http://www.event-s.net

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Wonder PK id in the EOModel
  • Next by Date: Re: Yet Another Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Next by thread: Yet Another Question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread