Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO

Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:22:45 +1300

Hello Mike;

What a vigourous debate this has ensued!

examples and build entire apps using session().defaultEditingContext().

I never really have any troubles with EC locking -- you mean when people make a new EC and forget to lock it?

I now no longer care about inverse relationships -- Wonder does that for me.

I saw that go through on a recent wonder build. It sounds good for "small relationships" -- how does this get avoided in large relationships?

cheers.

___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Migration Error

Next by Date:
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO

Previous by thread:
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO

Next by thread:
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO

Index(es):

Date
Thread