• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Tables Vs Divs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tables Vs Divs


  • Subject: Re: Tables Vs Divs
  • From: Patrick Middleton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:49:57 +0100


On 20 May 2008, at 04:45, Don Lindsay wrote:

hello;

People actually create their entire page layout using tables? That would be a nightmare, althought I guess I can see it if the application was created for IE 3, which really did not have a way to position elements well.

Don

IE3 -- or OmniWeb[34].

When I started, HTML was not a page description language (and as far as I'm concerned, it still isn't). If I'd wanted PostScript, I knew where to find it.
Using tables for layout was never that bad; I still find this approach far easier to understand than, say, heavy reliance on CSS2. NS4 was a problem because it supported nesting tables to a depth of only 3, but it was a reasonable assumption that if you needed more than that, you were doing it wrong.


One huge reason for using DIVs and CSS instead of HTML tables is accessibility. Not all web user agents are browsers. It is seen as hugely advantageous for users of assistive technologies like screen readers is to lay out your HTML in the order that you want the screen reader to read it, then style it with CSS to appear where you want when rendered on screen. This means you might have a classic three column layout with a header and a footer:

AAAAAA
BCCCCD
BCCCCD
BCCCCD
EEEEEE

but the first HTML encountered is the 'C' block. Needless to say I have never found a satisfactory way of achieving this. It is also true that the row and cell tags of an HTML table break up the content flow in such a way that can make the text incomprehensible when read aloud sequentially.

--
Patrick Middleton
OneStep Solutions plc
351 London Road             Phone: +44 (0)1702 426400
Hadleigh                    Fax:   +44 (0)1702 556855
Essex. SS7 2BT              Email: email@hidden
England                            (MIME welcome)

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Tables Vs Divs (From: Don Lindsay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Tables Vs Divs (From: "John Huss" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Tables Vs Divs (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Tables Vs Divs (From: Don Lindsay <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Coupling WO with Flex
  • Next by Date: Re: ExistsInRelationshipQualifier
  • Previous by thread: Re: Tables Vs Divs
  • Next by thread: Re: Tables Vs Divs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread