Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- Subject: Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:59:10 -0500
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
it runs the itunes music store
it runs me.com
it runs the jesusphone app store
That's iPhone, not jes...
wait.
Given: iPhone = jesusphone
Therefore: i = jesus
Therefore: I AM Jesus
Finally, proof. My must go tell my wife.
Dave
it runs the apple store
i get the feeling they are pretty committed to it.
Simon
On 14 Nov 2008, at 14:35, Timothy Reaves wrote:
I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our
proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal,
and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is
that one of the developers has pointed out that Apple has
deprecated the development tools. You can't write code without
tools. So it's clear that Apple is either going to release a new
tool set (even if that is WOLips), or completely abandon the
platform.
With Apple not divulging such info, I was wondering if anyone
might have any additional info on the mater: a private response
would be fine. It really comes down to no large company would ever
adopt something without knowing the vendor is going to continue to
support it (FUD, as invented by IBM!).
Any guidance would be appreciated.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden