Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- Subject: Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:53:41 -0500
On 14-Nov-08, at 9:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our
proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal,
and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is that
one of the developers has pointed out that Apple has deprecated the
development tools. You can't write code without tools.
So it's clear that Apple is either going to release a new tool set
(even if that is WOLips), or completely abandon the platform.
As others have alluded to Timothy, these are not the only two options.
I believe the path Apple is currently taking is: "Actively support and
focus on the runtime and let the community provide the tools"
With Apple not divulging such info, I was wondering if anyone might
have any additional info on the mater: a private response would be
fine. It really comes down to no large company would ever adopt
something without knowing the vendor is going to continue to support
it (FUD, as invented by IBM!).
;david
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden