Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- Subject: Re: Pushing for WebObjects?
- From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:10:22 -0500
On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:53 AM, David LeBer wrote:
On 14-Nov-08, at 9:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our
proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good
deal, and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have
is that one of the developers has pointed out that Apple has
deprecated the development tools. You can't write code without
tools.
So it's clear that Apple is either going to release a new tool set
(even if that is WOLips), or completely abandon the platform.
As others have alluded to Timothy, these are not the only two
options.
Actually, they are the only two options. Possibly a third, where
they have internal-only tools (ala Parts for Java). It seems based
on the feedback that it's options one: new tools, in the
manifestation of WOLips.
I think we're down to semantics now... you said "release" - and
Apple's never going to do that - Eclipse and WOLips is already
released :)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden