• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)


  • Subject: Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
  • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:24:47 +1100

Hi Ken,

On 28/11/2008, at 3:49 PM, dododo2020 dododo2020 wrote:

I would like to answer some questions for clearifying what I mean.

Sure.

<...>
WO is a mature product.
But mature is a before-death from a point of marketing.

Somehow ... death == marketing?


In general there are a life cycle pattern in technology.

Early adapters ........ Practical users ........ Consumers........death
This is a life cycle of Innovation.

To be clear - death only happens, as we know, when life ceases. Furthermore, the death of software is not immediately pending after consumers start buying into such technology. It depends on the usefulness of such technology (or in various cases on shrewd marketing). It also depends on whether that technology continues to solve the problems and challenges that are in demand (whether by few or by many).


Death may come for a particular /version/ of a piece of technology. Death may even come in terms of the way a particular piece of technology is delivered.... but this by no means suggests that, because of a focus shift for example, that death has arrived. No, this is called innovation and/or making a decision for the future allowing you to focus on what will continue to move forward.

Various parallel cycles occur.... So to take your example (extended)

conception ... development ... testing ... early adopters etc
    conception  ... development ... testing ...

I mean I want an innovation in WO for external users too.

Many in the community have lamented Apple's efforts in promoting WO to the world over the years. You can glean the list archives for the yearly pilgrimage to such mailing list threads about how WO is dead because it's not being promoted. I mean, even a simple 'Hello, World!' every now and then on some company's website (who remains nameless ;-) would raise the profile and perhaps peak various people's interest in the technology.


That said, I have been on this list for some years now and can confidently say that I've seen the community growing over the last few years. The technology remains relevant and is improving. Apple's focusing their efforts on the core technology (rather than the tools) and the community has supplied many complimentary things (WOLips, Wonder, Houdah, WOWODC, various blogs and wikis and training and so forth). All signs that WO is far from dead and is kicking on.

To be fair - it is not the buzz word on people's lips (depending who you talk to of course). But buzz words don't always solve problems. In some cases, the marketing has been so good that even though many would wish the technology to die it has lived on [1].

What you need to weigh up - is whether the technology in question will help you achieve you goals better/worse than something else. That will at times depend on what you're familiar with using.

If you know some of marketing you may understand what I mean.

Well, I'm not an expert in marketing (though am familiar with it nonetheless) but leaving the marketing team to make technology decisions without consultation with those who's job it is to utilise such technology is not a 'good thing'.


[1] You will know what I mean :-)
I am a Windows WO user.


I got lots of problems from Projectbuilder.e.g. compiling issues,adding
multiple files,package handling...

Eclipse/WOLips has been available for over two years. Have you not checked the wiki? This is actively developed and used by most. If you find issues .. submit a bug report and it will get fixed.


For me it seems that apple abandoned Windows users.

I've mentioned this already - so I'll say it once again. They've stopped developing the tools on *all* platforms for WO (ProjectBuilder etc). You now use Eclipse. This is the way forward.


And most of Jave
developers don't know what WO is.

Feel free to mention it to them. You might even be able to show them after you've installed Eclipse/WOLips and gotten familiar with it.


I think I can not say that using OSX and keeping WO to be the latest is the
best for them.

Not really relevant I would think.

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
      • From: "dododo2020 dododo2020" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141 (From: "dododo2020 dododo2020" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: "dododo2020 dododo2020" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
  • Next by Date: Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
  • Previous by thread: Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
  • Next by thread: Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread