• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider


  • Subject: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
  • From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:30:01 +1200

Hi Mike;

I spent a bit of time on this a few years ago and developed (and open- sourced) an AJP WO adaptor (AJP is a binary stream for HTTP used widely with Jetty and Tomcat deployment) to work with the built-in Apache 2.2 mod_balancer / mod_ajp / mod_proxy / mod_???. It worked really well, but after a while, one comes to realise that the bits missing out of the Apache 2.2 "mod_balancer" approach which are present in JavaMonitor / wotaskd are really quite nice. :)

Given how close "mod_balancer" is to the traditional WO deployment, it might be a nice approach for "mod_balancer" to take on-board the few additional concepts necessary to support something which works like "JavaMonitor / wotaskd" so that deploying a WO system does not need a special Apache module compiled for it. That would make a whole heap of documentation and confusion go away.

Another thought which may reduce the deployment documentation/ development overhead and ease-of-approach for newbies is that WOA's could be built into servlets all the time, but that there is a "special servlet container" built into WO runtime that can launch the app in a way which resembles a stand-alone execution of the application without the palaver that often goes with servlet deployments. This idea may be quite nice.

Anyway... just ideas.

cheers.

I've since reinterpreted Bill's comment to mean "everyone in the world of java" not "everyone in the world of wo" ... And I would agree with that, and there are technologies that are actually very similar to pieces of the WO deployment system that would be worth investigating to find the ideal solution to this problem.

___ Andrew Lindesay www.lindesay.co.nz

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >A WebObjects article on Appleinsider (From: Paul Stringer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider (From: William Hatch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
  • Next by Date: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
  • Previous by thread: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
  • Next by thread: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread