• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects


  • Subject: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:56:05 -0400


On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:

Yeah, if you are prone to anxiety this might not be the technology for you!


Ha!  Well put!

You know what's funny though - for all the macinations (heh) that people suspect, the NeXT based technologies have had longer lives than anything else I've ever used.

Objective-C? Was using it in 1990. What other languages were in use then?? C, Basic, PASCAL - you know, they're really big now. I built a commodity trading system in Objective-C starting in 1991... It's still being sold today.

WebObjects - lets see - 1996, right? What other object oriented web application server technologies were around in 1996? :)

People have been predicting the death of WebObjects for as long as I can remember - it's genuinely laughable now!

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
      • From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Yung-Luen Lan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Next by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Previous by thread: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread