• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects


  • Subject: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:33:00 -0400


On 15-Jun-09, at 10:56 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:


On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:

Yeah, if you are prone to anxiety this might not be the technology for you!


Ha!  Well put!

You know what's funny though - for all the macinations (heh) that people suspect, the NeXT based technologies have had longer lives than anything else I've ever used.

Objective-C? Was using it in 1990. What other languages were in use then?? C, Basic, PASCAL - you know, they're really big now. I built a commodity trading system in Objective-C starting in 1991... It's still being sold today.

WebObjects - lets see - 1996, right? What other object oriented web application server technologies were around in 1996? :)

People have been predicting the death of WebObjects for as long as I can remember - it's genuinely laughable now!

Technology in general doesn't age well. So "mature" is often interpreted a synonym for "old, dull, and crotchety, and just waiting for something young and sparkly to eat it's lunch".


It's a testament to WebObjects usefulness and design that it continues to prove naysayers wrong about it's survival.

It may also say something about the creators and users of Next inspired technology, we seem to be pretty tenacious and not likely to abandon our chosen tools without a damn good reason. i.e: Things would be a lot different if the Carbon faction at Apple had come out on top of the power struggle that occurred after the Next acquisition.

;david

--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: 	http://codeferous.com
blog: 	http://davidleber.net
profile:	http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter:	http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Yung-Luen Lan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Next by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Previous by thread: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Next by thread: WO deployment on Ubuntu
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread