Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:51:31 -0700
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
This already should have happened. Once you get a firm grasp of
the Java Collections API, it's design, intention and power,
NSArray and it's company will make you want to puke. I actually
thought that WO would move in this direction by first making
NSArray implement List, and do all the similar stuff, then
depreciate Foundation collections, and the finally get rid of
them. Well, maybe that still is the intention, but it sure is slow.
The lack of power sucks, but the lack of immutable forms of the
List/Map/Set interfaces in Java is a failure IMO. WO/EOF moving to
straight List/Map/Set would suffer from a loss in clarity as a
result. On the flip side, it would gain the performance and
flexibility of the Java collections APIs, which is a win. I'm
definitely conflicted on the correct answer to this conundrum.
Also, you lose a lot of really nice methods on the immutable ones
like arrayByAddingObject ...
We could replace them with good Wonder implementations which fix the
broken API. It has been done before...
:-P
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden