Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:53:57 -0700
On Mar 31, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
But I've found that common generic java programmers that I've
hired are uncomfortable with the foundation collection classes -
and perhaps understandably so - they've been brought up and
trained to use java collections.
The Orthodox Church of Java has ruined a couple of generations of
potentially good developers so far.
*sigh* I know -and now I'm in the weird position of arguing FOR
generic java - something I've (almost) never done before. But we
are in the progress of open sourcing our software and therefore, we
need to use standard java wherever possible :-/
That sucks serious horse****, as we say in Icelandic.
I don't know what the actual icelandic saying is, but I have
mentally filled in quite a few words, all of which are appropriate
and funny to varying degrees :)
Could be worse, could be Icelandic Shark Delicacy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTOfhQ_SZEg
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden