Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:36:28 -0700
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
On 1.4.2009, at 03:36, Chuck Hill wrote:
[...] Utility classes are a symptom of a defective API.
Indeed, but that's no problem - we'll just expand the original class
with a Category.
Oh.... Wait.... :-p
Where there is a need, there is a hack*:
http://www.csg.is.titech.ac.jp/projects/gluonj/
http://www.csg.is.titech.ac.jp/~chiba/javassist/
* Though my current thinking is that AOP is perhaps a good thing, or
at least an acknowledgment that inheritance can't solve all problems.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden