• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO alternatives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO alternatives


  • Subject: Re: WO alternatives
  • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:32:55 -0400

Ok, all innovations from the last 5 years come from Wonder, so I don't care if WO is open sourced or not, because I know innovations and bug fixes will come from Wonder, not from Apple. In fact, it's almost easier to sell WO by talking of Wonder, because you can say "Ok, so the core frameworks are not open source, but third parties frameworks extend it so much that's almost open source". And looking at the surveys results, I think a lot of the community would drop off WO if Wonder and WOLips didn't exist.
Exactly. What has Apple done for you lately? By lately, I mean since 2005? We got WO 5.4. If you used Wonder already, this wasn't exactly a world-changing event. People are acting like Apple treated us like a top-tier developer community and all of a sudden yanked the rug out from under us. We decided years ago that we weren't going to wait for Apple to give us anything for WebObjects, and I think we've added some pretty cool features into Wonder (other folks, too, I'm just obviously Wonder-biased :) ).

If Apple decided to NEVER ship another WebObjects version, how would your life be different? You know what would happen if WO had shipped on Snow Leopard? I would have continued to deploy my apps with WO 5.3 embedded, I would have replaced Monitor and wotaskd with Wonder's version, and I would have replaced mod_WebObjects with Wonder's version. In that sense, it's actually kind of convenient that WO didn't ship on Snow Leopard, because we have a clean slate and don't have to cleanup the one that shipped.

Show me a WO/EOF bug we can't figure out how to fix in Wonder and I'll get nervous. Until then, I'm going to continue to use one of the best frameworks that's ever been made.

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO alternatives
      • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
    • Re: WO alternatives
      • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
References: 
 >WO alternatives (From: Daniel Mejia <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO alternatives (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO alternatives (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO alternatives (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO alternatives (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Installation on SnowLeopard
  • Next by Date: Re: Anybody doing Deployment on 10.6
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO alternatives
  • Next by thread: Re: WO alternatives
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread