Re: WO alternatives
Re: WO alternatives
- Subject: Re: WO alternatives
- From: Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:43:20 +0300
I am working on a set of rather complex apps serving a major
entertainment site with tens of millions daily visitors. Feel free to
email me if you have specific questions about this setup.
I should mention here that Tapestry having a built-in dependency
injection container is a big part of our success with this particular
stack.
Andrus
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:36 PM, Luke Holton wrote:
All,
Has anyone any experience/comments on a Tapestry / Cayenne
combination?
Regards,
Luke Holton
Tel: (602) 279-4600 ext 622
Fax: (602) 279-4768
Desert Sky Software: www.desertsky.com
Specializing in the Development and Hosting of
e-Business Applications.
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Joe Little wrote:
Yes, I find Grails or more specifically GORM to be the closest
analogy. Very Rails inspired, but where it differs, it feels just
like
WO. I just hate JSP/GSP presentation layer, so GRAILS in the end
doesn't float my boat.
LiftWeb is painful to the eyes. Scala is great, LiftWeb just won't
gain traction with my brain.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Alexis Tual <email@hidden>
wrote:
Le 9 oct. 09 ? 15:28, Pascal Robert a ?crit :
Le 09-10-09 ? 08:00, Q a ?crit :
On 09/10/2009, at 9:07 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I'm wondering if we can just migrate and adapt Wonder on top of a
project like GETobjects so that we can have a exit point, just
in case...
GETObjects, not likely, it's quite different, not API
compatible, and not
as complete. You would be giving up a lot you probably take for
granted
right now, and gaining stuff you probably already solved in
other ways.
What's the intended end point? Having something that is fully
opensource,
or having a stack that won't live or die by apple's hand?
Door #2. Ok, all innovations from the last 5 years come from
Wonder, so I
don't care if WO is open sourced or not, because I know
innovations and bug
fixes will come from Wonder, not from Apple. In fact, it's almost
easier to
sell WO by talking of Wonder, because you can say "Ok, so the core
frameworks are not open source, but third parties frameworks
extend it so
much that's almost open source". And looking at the surveys
results, I think
a lot of the community would drop off WO if Wonder and WOLips
didn't exist.
Couldn't agree more ! And by the way jar frameworks and maven
support add a
lot of credibility to the framework too.
GETobjects needs some work, but has potential if you couldn't
use WO.
http://www.getobjects.org
On 09/10/2009, at 9:04 AM, Daniel Mejia wrote:
Hi all,
If you have to choose another framework for Web Development ,
different than WO, what could be your selection?
We're likely to use Grails which is a "full stack" framework.
We've been using Wicket as a presentation framework but i wouldn't
recommend
it to WO users or Cocoa lovers as it's like writing Swing code.
We've also experienced Cayenne which is also very similar to EOF.
Regards,
Alex.
We are looking for alternatives and I would like to know if
somebody
knows something close to WO...
Regards,
Daniel.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden
)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Seeya...Q
Quinton Dolan - email@hidden
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
-------------------------------------------------------
Pascal Robert
Twitter | AIM/iChat : MacTICanada
--
Seeya...Q
Quinton Dolan - email@hidden
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden