Re: WebObjects and dependency injection (DI)
Re: WebObjects and dependency injection (DI)
- Subject: Re: WebObjects and dependency injection (DI)
- From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:02:39 +0200
Am 21.09.2009 um 22:46 schrieb Andrus Adamchik:
To be sure all of that can be achieved without DI. DI just makes it
declarative and cleaner, and actually encourages you to follow this
specific development pattern.
Thanks for the write-up, but yeah, this can all be achieved w/o it. I
really don't see why I shouldn't configure my app with if
(Configration.isStaging())... and instead use DI. At least my way I
easily find all the occurrences and have full logic support if(!
Configuration.isStaging()). How is DI "cleaner" in any way when:
- I have any number of DI containers and their various syntax to chose
from
- I can't *find* the dependencies when I really want or need them.
Have you ever tried to debug such an app that wasn't written by
yourself? Take a look at the Red5 Media server for some fun...
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden