Re: Weird Sorting issue mentioned in D2W Locking Error - probably fixed
Re: Weird Sorting issue mentioned in D2W Locking Error - probably fixed
- Subject: Re: Weird Sorting issue mentioned in D2W Locking Error - probably fixed
- From: "Andrew R. Kinnie" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:29:38 -0500
OK, so I made an assumption. I thought the performanceType was mandatory, so I didn't get the outer join suggestion. Now after talking to Dave A, I get it. It wasn't mandatory, so the inner join excluded it when it didn't exist. If I had an outer, it would have appeared, but it would have gone wherever nulls would go (as opposed to where I wanted it).
If I had gotten the array, then in code applied the sort order to it, I'd have gotten the same result (without changing the type of join).
However, as I want this to be mandatory, I should change that, then it should work. (I'll know when I get home)
On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote:
>
>> OK, well I did that, and even re-booted the machine. No change.
>>
>> In other news if I eliminate my second sort ordering, the previously missing booking appears.
>
> That sounds like maybe you have a inner join where you want an outer join.
>
>
>> I changed it to use ERXSortOrdering and get the same result.
>>
>> I need a beer.
>
> Under these circumstances I'd suggest Brennivín and lots of it. I'll leave the inclusion of fermented shark to your own discretion.
>
>
> Chuck
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden