Re: Does the ERXStaticResourceRequestHandler work with those compressed jarred resources?
Re: Does the ERXStaticResourceRequestHandler work with those compressed jarred resources?
- Subject: Re: Does the ERXStaticResourceRequestHandler work with those compressed jarred resources?
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:06:35 +1000
On 22/07/2010, at 1:00 PM, Mr. G Brown wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Or your deployment needs fixing to not assume jar frameworks :)
Mike: Now that you're moving (have moved?) to the inside... I'm sure you'll have need to broaden your horizons ;-)
>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:29 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>>
>>> You'll find that the implementation for this needs fixing so that it doesn't assume *.framework resources. :-/
>
> So public class ERXStaticResourceRequestHandler extends WORequestHandler , but you can just drop back to vanilla WORequestHandler? I think this issue was marked fixed, by going back to WORequestHandler?
>
> There needs to be a list of webobjects 5.3 vs 5.4 and the Wonder issues. I know Chuck as some 5.4 vs 5.3 differences. I also know that wocheckboxes need a work around in 5.4.
>
> Is anybody using 5.4?
Yes.
> It is too bad that Wonder doesn't work so well with the jar frameworks; sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't...
If I had the need/time/opportunity I'd fix WONDER-461 etc. This is not only (if at all) a WO54 issue. My previous comment was not about WO but Wonder's ERXFileUtilities, for example. WOLips used to have similar issues. Anyway, as Mike said, patches welcome.
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden