• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: SVN and Eclipse
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SVN and Eclipse


  • Subject: Re: SVN and Eclipse
  • From: Farrukh Ijaz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:10:19 +0300

At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, as a result it will start eating repository disk space very fast. I see plan C would be the best choice iff you can switch to hudson. Otherwise instead storing the tar, tag the successful revision.

Farrukh

Sent from my iPad

On 30-Jul-2010, at 12:31 AM, Mike Schrag <email@hidden> wrote:

> Plan C: Use Hudson
>
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
>
>> Chuck Hill wrote:
>>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> OK, this is really an Eclipse SVN question, but since the WO is all Eclipse I figured I ask here (if this is not the right list, I apologize and will send to the right one).
>>>>
>>>> I have a project in an SVN repository. I decided to add the tar ball produced by ant in my "dist/" directory to the repository. From command line there are no problems, svn update/commit/status all work, but from within Eclipse the contents of "dist/" seem to get ignored. If after a build I hit F5 and refresh the package explorer, the tar ball get's marked as changed, but the "commit" does not see it. The pattern "*.gz" is unselected in Team->Ignored Resources and neither "dist/" nor the tar ball have any SVN attribute set.
>>>>
>>>> A related annoying thing is that if I hit "Clean..." in project it deletes the "dist/" directory, which means it loses all of the SVN information. Any way to customize the clean to keep it from doing this ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd choose Plan B: do this another way.  Make a LastBuild folder and modify build.xml to copy the tarball into that folder at the end of the build.  Otherwise you are going to be fighting WOLips and WOLips is going to win.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I was afraid that this was going to be the answer ...
>>
>> --
>> Valerio Luccio			(212) 998-8736
>> Center for Brain Imaging	4 Washington Place, Room 156
>> New York University		New York, NY 10003
>>
>>       "In an open world, who needs windows or gates?"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: SVN and Eclipse
      • From: Valerio Luccio <email@hidden>
References: 
 >SVN and Eclipse (From: Valerio Luccio <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SVN and Eclipse (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SVN and Eclipse (From: Valerio Luccio <email@hidden>)
 >Re: SVN and Eclipse (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Encode HTML in Java and decode in other API
  • Next by Date: Re: SVN and Eclipse
  • Previous by thread: Re: SVN and Eclipse
  • Next by thread: Re: SVN and Eclipse
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread