Re: SVN and Eclipse
Re: SVN and Eclipse
- Subject: Re: SVN and Eclipse
- From: Valerio Luccio <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:57:06 -0400
Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, as a result it will start eating repository disk space very fast. I see plan C would be the best choice iff you can switch to hudson. Otherwise instead storing the tar, tag the successful revision.
Farrukh
True, but I don't create tarballs that often and it's only 1.1 MB,
storage space is not an issue. I guess they could check out the code
from dist just as well, I'm not sure why I went down the tarball route ...
--
Valerio Luccio (212) 998-8736
Center for Brain Imaging 4 Washington Place, Room 156
New York University New York, NY 10003
"In an open world, who needs windows or gates?"
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden